Current:Home > InvestJudge won’t block North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for children -AssetTrainer
Judge won’t block North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for children
View
Date:2025-04-24 14:42:13
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A North Dakota law banning gender-affirming care for children will continue to be enforced pending a court challenge, but any kids whose treatments began before the law took effect in April 2023 can keep getting the care, according to a judge’s ruling released Wednesday.
Judge Jackson Lofgren denied a preliminary injunction sought by families seeking to overturn the law, as he had previously done in November when the plaintiffs sought a temporary restraining order.
The plaintiffs said a grandfather clause in the law is so vague it led providers to stop treatments in the state, but the judge made clear those minors can continue any medical care they had before the law took effect.
It isn’t clear that the plaintiffs are “substantially” likely to win their case, now scheduled for a November trial, on claims that the law violates rights to parent or to personal autonomy and self-determination, the judge said.
He also sided against claims that the grandfather clause is unconstitutionally vague, and that the plaintiffs have shown irreparable harm. With the current law in effect for more than a year now, Lofgren said “the public interest in maintaining the status quo weighs against granting a preliminary injunction.”
The law took immediate effect when Republican Gov. Doug Burgum signed it in April 2023 after overwhelming approval by the GOP-controlled legislature. It makes it a misdemeanor for a health care provider to prescribe or give hormone treatments or puberty blockers to a transgender child, and a felony to perform gender-affirming surgery on a minor.
“The longer this law is allowed to remain in effect, the more North Dakota kids and families will be harmed by the state’s unfair, unjust, and unconstitutional denial of the essential and life-saving health care they need,” Gender Justice Senior Staff Attorney Brittany Stewart, who represents the families and a doctor challenging the ban.
Republican state Rep. Bill Tveit, who brought the bill, was pleased with the ruling. He said the law protects children from irreversible procedures.
Opponents said the ban will harm transgender kids who face greater risks of depression, self-harm and suicide, and stressed that no one performs such surgeries in the state.
Despite the exception for children who were receiving treatments before the ban took effect, providers have considered the grandfather clause too vague to risk it, so the plaintiff families have had to travel out of state to get gender-affirming care for their children, Gender Justice said.
The judge disagreed, writing that such children “can receive any gender-affirming care they could have received in North Dakota prior to the Health Care Law’s enactment.”
Gender Justice agreed that the clarification “paves the way for providers to resume care for these patients in North Dakota.”
“However, significant barriers to access will remain for most or all children and families seeking care in North Dakota, as doctors who stopped providing care to transgender youth may hesitate to resume care due to concerns over the serious legal threats posed by the law,” the organization’s statement said.
Twenty-five states have adopted bans on gender-affirming care for minors in the past few years, nearly all of them challenged in court. Arkansas is appealing after a court struck down its ban entirely. Courts blocked enforcement of the law in Montana. And the ACLU has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review whether the bans should remain in effect in Kentucky and Tennessee. The high court has allowed the Idaho law to remain in effect while lawsuits proceed.
___
AP writer Geoff Mulvihill contributed to this report from Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
For more AP coverage of LGBTQ+ issues: https://apnews.com/hub/lgbtq-legislation
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- How law enforcement is promoting a troubling documentary about 'sextortion'
- Neurotech could connect our brains to computers. What could go wrong, right?
- Changing our clocks is a health hazard. Just ask a sleep doctor
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Mass Die-Off of Puffins Raises More Fears About Arctic’s Warming Climate
- Billions of people lack access to clean drinking water, U.N. report finds
- Coasts Should Plan for 6.5 Feet Sea Level Rise by 2100 as Precaution, Experts Say
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Solar Industry to Make Pleas to Save Key Federal Subsidy as It Slips Away
Ranking
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Fans Think Bad Bunny Planted These Kendall Jenner Easter Eggs in New Music Video “Where She Goes”
- Hawaii, California Removing Barrier Limiting Rooftop Solar Projects
- Salman Rushdie Makes First Onstage Appearance Since Stabbing Attack
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Tweeting directly from your brain (and what's next)
- ‘Essential’ but Unprotected, Farmworkers Live in Fear of Covid-19 but Keep Working
- What to know about xylazine, the drug authorities are calling a public safety threat
Recommendation
Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
Q&A: Denis Hayes, Planner of the First Earth Day, Discusses the ‘Virtual’ 50th
Read the transcript: What happened inside the federal hearing on abortion pills
Salman Rushdie Makes First Onstage Appearance Since Stabbing Attack
Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
Bear kills Arizona man in highly uncommon attack
Jamie Lynn Spears Shares Big Update About Zoey 102: Release Date, Cast and More
As Ticks Spread, New Disease Risks Threaten People, Pets and Livestock